2010/8/25 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com>: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:52:45AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> > FWIW, I'm with Jon and Adam on this one. I just don't see how not having >> > an MTA by default is a win, except in disk space terms, and it takes up >> > a tiny amount of disk space (especially if we pick a lighter-weight one >> > than sendmail to be the default). I think it makes sense to keep one, >> > for all the good reasons they cited. >> >> Shipping an MTA by default just gives developers the expectation that if >> they pass something to sendmail then it'll be read by a human. Since >> that's plainly untrue we should stop doing it and replace it with >> something that's actually useful. > > By all means change the default MTA to something that 'works out of the > box' in some way, yes. That'd be great, and much more of a feature than > 'let's just remove it'.
as i wrote before i am not religous at all about an mta itsself but rather about proper working notifications with history for raid failure and logwatch. so a clear +1 here. kind regards, rudolf kastl > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
