On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 15:58 Adam Saleh <asa...@redhat.com> wrote: > Way we were discussing this, I think there were several points I didn't > really see here. > > a) we are gathering requirements for Git Forge, but we need a good Dist > Git as well. > > There might be difference in requirements and tooling for Dist Git > compared to generic fully featured Git Forge. > It might still be useful to abandon Pagure as a full-featured git-forge > and instead focus on making it really useful as a dist-git solution. > > b) Whatever we decide, there will be significant investment required. > Either by re-investing in our existing solution, or in the migration > effort. > > I think we really want to avoid the `Polarion` situation, where we wouldn't > be clear about all of the costs involved in migration, and end up with a > solution that only saved effort/money on paper, > and in reality it could cost many a man-day of > migration/maintenance/workaround efforts. > > I am not yet sure how to make this less vague, and more "Gathering > requirements", > @Leigh Griffin <lgrif...@redhat.com> will there be some sort of a poll in > the end, or how do we actually get a list of requirements? >
This thread is serving as a source of requirements (although it has meandered dramatically away from that) but I will default to the Fedora Council for how a combined set from the input in this thread and others is collated and presented. When all requirements are gathered from all stakeholders I will share the distilled version out. > > I assume we are in the "Research" phase of ODF [1], but this is first time > I am interacting with the framework :-) > We are in that phase of getting requirements and analyzing them. Sorry on my phone here so I can't be 100% sure of the formal phases off hand. > > Adam > > [1] > https://github.com/red-hat-people-team/open-decision-framework/blob/master/ODF-community.md > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 4:56 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:37 am, Michael Catanzaro >> <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: >> > It doesn't have as many features as github.com, >> >> Sorry, this was a typo. I meant: it doesn't have as many features as >> gitlab.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
