On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 20:51 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jeff Law: > > > As we both know, GCC has had ABI bugs as well. Both compilers strive > > to be ABI compatible with each other and we should continue to work > > together to find and address such issues. SImilarly both compilers > > are going to have codegen issues, or rejects-valid-code bugs. > > Ultimately they're just bugs and I don't see that one toolchain or the > > other is inherently better than the other, particularly WRT ABI > > issues. > > More problematic are not ABI bugs, but the cases where the ABI > divergence is a matter of opinion (more or less). Yes because these are much less likely to get fixed. THankfully these don't pop up nearly as often.
> > I think we really should figure out what to do about the alignment of > _Atomic long long on 32-bit. GCC has 4, Clang has 8. Clang seems to be > correct here. This also has implications for the use of libatomic. Yes. I thought we bumped up that bug in the database so that it'd get some attention in the gcc-10 cycle. But I couldn't follow it myself, so I don't know what happened. jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
