On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:44 PM John M. Harris Jr <joh...@splentity.com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, June 29, 2020 11:35:55 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 6/29/20 9:40 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkManager_keyfile_instead_of_i
> > > fcfg_rh
>
> > > == Summary ==
> > > Change the default settings plugin of NetworkManager so that new
> > > profiles will be created in keyfile format instead of ifcfg-rh format.
> >
> >
> > Is there any easy way to convert profiles from ifcfg-rh to keyfile?
>
> I don't think that'd be a good idea. The Change shows that ifcfg-rh formatted
> files will continue to be supported, so it's not required, and there are many
> people that only know the ifcfg-rh formatted configuration, such as myself.
> Additionally, there's a lot that could go wrong in yanking config files from
> one format to the other.
>
> Maybe an alternative option would be to store as a keyfile instead of ifcfg-rh
> if modified by one of the NetworkManager dbus clients, but otherwise leave
> ifcfg-rh?
>

This already happens for things that don't fit into ifcfg-rh format.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to