The main argument is that for typical and varied workloads in Fedora,
mostly on consumer hardware, we should use mq-deadline scheduler
rather than either none or bfq.

It may be true most folks with NVMe won't see anything bad with none,
but those who have heavier IO workloads are likely to be better off
with mq-deadline.

Further details are in the bug, but let's discuss it on list. Thanks!

Chris Murphy
devel mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:

Reply via email to