On Thu, 1 Oct 2020, Neal Gompa wrote:

Essentially, split-horizon DNS setups on Fedora systems become
possible with this change.

As reported by libreswan and openvpn developers already in the last
two days, these are already possible without systemd-resolved and
people have relied on that for years.

We have also seen reports like one where servers in an Active Directory
domain with systemd-resolved have broken DNS due to load issues.

Clearly, there is a case for making systemd-resolved "default with
an option to opt-out". It makes no sense that these deployments
must install and ensure to then disable and keep disabled, the
systemd-resolved daemon.

The argument against this so far has been "it makes things more
complicated". I have asked for specific details on this so we can
talk about potentially addressing those complications and make
everybody happy.

Paul
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to