On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:46 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote: > I see this documented here: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/#_consequences_of_a_package_being_deprecated > > but not in the packaging guideline: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > and IIRC fedora-review does not require this check either. I think it's > probably quite safe to assume the risk of someone creating a new > package that depends on xemacs or neXtaw to be quite low, but should > the main guidelines and fedora-review be updated too? (separately from > this Change, that is). > > I must admit this is the first time I noticed `Provides: deprecated()`
Actually, fedora-review does check for deprecated dependencies. See CheckIfDepsDeprecated in /usr/share/fedora-review/plugins/generic.py. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
