More issues with this change:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246
Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the
build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With
this change, a path that only exists during the parent package build
stage is injected, and basically extensions are broken. I consider
this a bug in rpm-config-macros. If later-non-valid flags are required
for this change, then they should be injected via some private
variable in order to keep %{build_*flags} clean.
Iñaki
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 16:21, Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2022/01/24 17:55:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It
> >>> broke multiple packages at the linking stage:
> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178
> >>>
> >>> On the package-note repo https://github.com/systemd/package-notes
> >>> it is said that it requires binutils (>= 2.38) but it hasn't been
> >>> released yet.
> >>>
> >>> Can the owners of this change chime in?
> >>
> >> I would appreciate any insights that can be offered into why the
> >> frama-c build is failing:
> >>
> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81690392
> >>
> >> It's got something to do with this change, since the linker is
> >> complaining that it cannot find the package-note file, but I am
> >> unclear how this change is supposed to interact with the OCaml
> >> ecosystem.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the problem was that the %_package_note_file macro uses %buildsubdir,
> > and %buildsubdir is set during %prep, but it seems it only available
> > during %build and later. So the path was set wrong… I pushed a work-around
> > to set %_package_note_file directly before prep and started a new build.
> >
> > (I wish we had something better for this. %buildsubdir is useful, but
> > very fragile.)
>
> Well, it turned up that this issue (that %buildsubdir is unusable in %prep)
> also affects gabedit as:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file
> /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-gabedit-2.5.1-11.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such
> file or directory
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/gabedit?collection=f36
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81664083
>
> Can't this issue be fixed in package-notes rpm side?
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Iñaki Úcar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
