On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> More issues with this change:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246
>
> Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the
> build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With
> this change, a path that only exists during the parent package build
> stage is injected, and basically extensions are broken. I consider
> this a bug in rpm-config-macros. If later-non-valid flags are required
I meant redhat-rpm-config, apologies.
Iñaki
> for this change, then they should be injected via some private
> variable in order to keep %{build_*flags} clean.
>
> Iñaki
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 16:21, Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2022/01/24 17:55:
> > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It
> > >>> broke multiple packages at the linking stage:
> > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178
> > >>>
> > >>> On the package-note repo https://github.com/systemd/package-notes
> > >>> it is said that it requires binutils (>= 2.38) but it hasn't been
> > >>> released yet.
> > >>>
> > >>> Can the owners of this change chime in?
> > >>
> > >> I would appreciate any insights that can be offered into why the
> > >> frama-c build is failing:
> > >>
> > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81690392
> > >>
> > >> It's got something to do with this change, since the linker is
> > >> complaining that it cannot find the package-note file, but I am
> > >> unclear how this change is supposed to interact with the OCaml
> > >> ecosystem.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the problem was that the %_package_note_file macro uses %buildsubdir,
> > > and %buildsubdir is set during %prep, but it seems it only available
> > > during %build and later. So the path was set wrong… I pushed a work-around
> > > to set %_package_note_file directly before prep and started a new build.
> > >
> > > (I wish we had something better for this. %buildsubdir is useful, but
> > > very fragile.)
> >
> > Well, it turned up that this issue (that %buildsubdir is unusable in %prep)
> > also affects gabedit as:
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-gabedit-2.5.1-11.fc36.x86_64.ld: No
> > such file or directory
> >
> > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/gabedit?collection=f36
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81664083
> >
> > Can't this issue be fixed in package-notes rpm side?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mamoru
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Úcar
--
Iñaki Úcar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
