On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:17 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On 26/01/2022 09:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > If your only motivation is to avoid the review, then please don't. > > Reviews are good. They discover problems with the package (if done > > properly).
(snip) > Fedora backgrounds package contains only a few PNG images already > approved by the Design team. Additional review is not required. Looking back at previous releases, this is not true at all. Many blocker bugs and additional RC composes were caused by wrong packaging of the fNN-backgrounds package, which was only found after GNOME or KDE or XFCE maintainers found out that the new wallpapers package doesn't work correctly for their desktop. Why not just have the design team publish the wallpapers as a release tarball, and let the actual DE maintainers work on the fNN-backgrounds package? They should know how to do it correctly, and working together on a review request should iron out all the initial problems. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
