V Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:42:41PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:26:45PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > > $ dnf5 repoquery -l $(dnf5 repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/sbin/*' --qf 
> > > '%{name}\n') | rg '/usr/s?bin/' | sed -r 's|(.*)/([^/]*)$|\2|' | sort | 
> > > uniq -c | rg -w 2
> > >
> > > says that /usr/sbin/{makemap,rpcinfo,rpcbind,sestatus,udevadm}
> > > "shadow" files in /usr/bin. But those are all symlinks, i.e. they will
> > > need just to be dropped to prevent a FTBFS. I added this list with
> > > four packages to the Scope section.
> > 
> > Thanks, but I think the query does not produce
> > all possible results, as I know for a fact that there is
> > a package (exabgp) that has both a /usr/sbin/exabgp-healthcheck
> > and a (different) /usr/bin/exabgp-healthcheck file
> > (which is why I prompted my query, as I expect
> > there might be others (I plan to fix exabgp)).
> 
> Indeed. With both dnf-5 and dnf5, the inner repoquery doesn't list exabgp.
> Either a bug or I'm doing something wrong.
> 
Thanks for testing DNF5. I notified DNF5 maintainers
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/1153>.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to