changed spec file:
[1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/speed-dreams.spec

could not build with mock: No match for argument: FreeSOLID-devel >= 2.1.2

I get this error messages when building with rpmbuild -ba speed-dreams.spec

+ rm -f 
/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/speed-dreams-2.4.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/include/3D/Makefile.am
+ rm -f 
/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/speed-dreams-2.4.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/include/SOLID/Makefile.am
+ /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j2 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed 
2.4.1-1.fc42 --unique-debug-suffix -2.4.1-1.fc42.x86_64 --unique-debug-src-base 
speed-dreams-2.4.1-1.fc42.x86_64 --run-dwz --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 10000000 
--dwz-max-die-limit 110000000 -S debugsourcefiles.list 
/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/speed-dreams-2.4.1-build/speed-dreams-2.4.1
find-debuginfo: starting
Extracting debug info from 30 files
DWARF-compressing 30 files
sepdebugcrcfix: Updated 30 CRC32s, 0 CRC32s did match.
Creating .debug symlinks for symlinks to ELF files
Copying sources found by 'debugedit -l' to 
/usr/src/debug/speed-dreams-2.4.1-1.fc42.x86_64
find-debuginfo: done
+ '[' '%{buildarch}' = noarch ']'
+ QA_CHECK_RPATHS=1
+ case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*******************************************************************************
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH OR RUNPATH and will cause
*          'rpmbuild' to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the
*          '$QA_RPATHS' environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the
*          values below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000.
*
*    0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
*               issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
*               providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
*               environments.
*    0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
*               nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*    0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
*               SECURITY risk
*    0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
*               RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*    0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
*               and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*    0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
*               the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*          
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
*   $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
*   $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*  
*******************************************************************************
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/lib64/libsolid.so' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/lib64/libmoto.so' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/lib64/libbroad.so' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
*******************************************************************************
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH OR RUNPATH and will cause
*          'rpmbuild' to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the
*          '$QA_RPATHS' environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the
*          values below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000.
*
*    0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
*               issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
*               providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
*               environments.
*    0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
*               nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*    0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
*               SECURITY risk
*    0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
*               RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*    0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
*               and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*    0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
*               the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*          
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
*   $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
*   $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*  
*******************************************************************************
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/speed-dreams-2' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/sd2-accc' contains a standard runpath '/usr/lib64' 
in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/sd2-nfs2ac' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/sd2-nfsperf' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/sd2-trackgen' contains a standard runpath 
'/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/games/speed-dreams-2/lib]
Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1nSC8v (%install)
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to