On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 01:27:05PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 8/24/25 10:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 04:48:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > ...snip.. > > > > > > Although it seems like s390x builders have changed recently from 3 "cpus" > > > to > > > 2 - is that correct? It seems like I've seen some additional creep up > > > recently to 12:30 but less data on that. > > > > That change was made in december of last year. We needed more, smaller > > builders to handle the building flow. > > > > There is still one with 3 cpus ( buildvm-s390x-20 ) thats in the > > 'heavybuild' channel. > > > > We did apply updates and reboot on aug 4th > > We did upgrade things to f42 in july. > > > > No other hardware changes I know of... > > Thanks for the info. What qualifies things for the "heavybuild" channel?
They are unable to build at all unless they are given more resources. :) At least thats my take on it. I would really really prefer to just not have a seperate channel. It's really bad from a number of angles. Post datacenter move, the s390x one is the only one thats seperate (ie, currently aarch64, ppc64le, x86_64 'heavybuild' builders are just equal to the normal ones). Currently there's 4 packages in it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/blob/main/f/roles/koji_hub/templates/hub.conf.j2#_198 (although webkit2gtk4.0 is now blocked/retired, should remove it). kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue