On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 3:14 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 12:41:11 PM -00:00:00, Miloš Komarčević > <kmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The heif-thumbnailer is a slightly different story, as it doesn't > > rely on gdk-pixbuf. Nonetheless, I have just asked upstream to add an > > option to disable it as well, so you could potentially add that patch > > to also skip packaging the (legacy?) thumbnailer: > > https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/pull/1595 > > I have submitted > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libheif/pull-request/18 which > removes the pixbuf loader but not the thumbnailer, since the > thumbnailer should still work fine. I think most Fedora users won't > have the heif-thumbnailer installed, because it's part of > libheif-tools, but we don't need to remove it. > > I'm not sure which thumbnailer will win if you have both > glycin-thumbnailer and heif-thumbnailer installed at the same time. The > Glycin thumbnailer can handle AVIF and HEIF images as well... because > it uses libheif itself to do so. :D Which is good for us. If image-rs > eventually adds support for HEIC, then we'd need to strip the package.
For the record: glycin's HEIF loader uses libheif, not the "image" crate. So glycin-thumbnailer support for HEIF should be the same as that of libheif itself. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
