On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 16:53 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 02:30:43 PM -07:00:00, Adam Williamson > <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Are there not Obsoletes: in place? If not, how is this expected to > > work > > for GNOME users on upgrade? > > There are a bunch of Obsoletes, but not for the thumbnailer. > Unfortunately the gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer is not its own subpackage so > we can't just have glycin-thumbnailer Obsoletes it. That's why I added > it to comps.
I think you can achieve the effect with versioned obsoletes. glycin-thumbnailer is in package glycin, and gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer is in gdk-pixbuf2, right? I *think* this should achieve the goal: glycin Obsoletes: gdk-pixbuf2 < 2.43.5-2 gdk-pixbuf2 Obsoletes: gdk-pixbuf2 < 2.43.5-2 That *should* cause glycin to be installed and gdk-pixbuf2 to be updated, when doing a system update from gdk-pixbuf2 < 2.43.5-2 to current. Please yell if you see a problem with this. :P -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
