On 9/11/25 11:00 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 4:57 PM Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Steven A. Falco wrote on 2025/09/11 23:37:
I tried to upgrade my rawhide VM; it is using the XFCE desktop. I got the
following:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides webp-pixbuf-loader(x86-64) needed by
xfdesktop-4.20.1-2.fc43.x86_64 from rawhide
Looking at the webp-pixbuf-loader I see:
$ cat dead.package
Not required since glycine replaces it
Is there a plan to update xfdesktop to use glycine? (Cc'ing the maintainers of
xfdesktop.)
I noticed that the rawhide spins don't have an XFCE iso - perhaps this is due
to the above issue?
Steve
Looks like gdk-pixbuf2.x86_64 should have "Provides:
webp-pixbuf-loader(x86-64)" as well
as "Provides: webp-pixbuf-loader", ref:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdk-pixbuf2/c/696aeff893bd480321e7ecfb41d1a545c3f306d6?branch=rawhide
No, that would be wrong. The package didn't subsume those third-party
loaders - they were dropped completely, so it shouldn't Provide them.
I submitted a PR for xfdesktop that should fix this issue:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfdesktop/pull-request/2
Fabio
I tried the PR and it does indeed fix the issue. xfdesktop built successfully
and worked properly. Thanks!
Will this automatically unblock building the iso for XFCE in rawhide or is
something manual needed?
Steve
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
