On Thu, Sep 11 2025 at 05:00:05 PM +02:00:00, Fabio Valentini
<decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
No, that would be wrong. The package didn't subsume those third-party
loaders - they were dropped completely, so it shouldn't Provide them.
I added Provides anyway, since otherwise we'll have a bunch of broken
packages in rawhide and F43. I think it's not too semantically
outrageous because the builtin loader really does support webp.
But I only added "Provides: webp-pixbuf-loader", not "Provides:
webp-pixbuf-loader%{?_isa} which is evidently required here. :(
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
