On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:36:04PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > This is something we actually wanted to try for ELN. I feel like I > remember a conversation from the recent past where we figured out that > the major impediment to doing this had actually been fixed (it was > related to HTTP timeouts trying to add all of the packages, I think). > I'm pretty sure we'd been given the green light to try this for the > ~2500 packages in ELN. I'm CCing Yaakov Selkowitz and Adam Williamson > directly who could correct me if I'm misremembering.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12869 we were going to test in staging, but haven't yet done so. > So maybe it's worth giving it a try? If it fails, we can always fall > back to the direct tagging option. I suppose... if it fails it might cause a mess, but if we do decide to do this, please coordinate so we can bring bodhi back if it gets in a bad state. > Karolina: Either way, I think we need to do this in a side-tag, if > only to have an easy way to look up what potentially needs tagging. > Since we're past the Bodhi activation point, we can't rely on > automation to create all of the individual updates (short of > submitting them as a single update from a side-tag). yeah. kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
