On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 3:24 AM Ben Beasley <[email protected]> wrote: > It’s probably worth impact-checking this in COPR or with local mock builds > before proceeding, as at least python-pyscipopt is definitely not yet > compatible with SCIP 10. I’ll work up a PR for it based on a snapshot of > upstream’s work-in-progress branch > https://github.com/scipopt/PySCIPOpt/pull/1009, which is certainly incomplete > but may be in a state good enough to ship in Rawhide for now.
I have local mock builds of all of the other reverse dependencies. Some of them needed small patches due to name changes in the Verbosity enum, but otherwise built fine with the new versions. I can wait until python-pyscipopt upstream releases a new version. From the discussion on the relevant PR, it sounds like they are close. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
