On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 2:23 AM Jerry James <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is a MUST, so the packages listed below are in violation of the > guidelines. Thanks for the actual checking (that is more effort than I was interested in doing). A few of those seem to be somewhat important (such as "kernel"). I would guess (and it is only a guess) that many of these packages (and perhaps their current packagers) predate the most recent guidelines. AFAIK when a package guideline is updated or clarified, there is not a systematic review of existing packages. That does suggest that those proposing changes in guidelines need to also take ownership of the process to fix packages that no longer in compliance with their proposals. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
