On 2/10/26 14:15, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I believe it was built but not submitted. Easy to oversight during
winter holidays:
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2882264
Oops, filed https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-477eba7a02
Although I think I got distracted by it failing to build for F42.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 8:07 PM Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 2:04 PM Przemek Klosowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/10/26 11:10 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:52 AM Przemek Klosowski via devel
<[email protected]> wrote:
The Maxima symbolic algebra package developers talked recently about new
versions not being available via RPM and DEB packages, so as I read both
Maxima and Fedora lists, I thought I'd ask here. Both Fedora and Ubuntu
distribute version 5.47
Maxima 5.47.0 using Lisp SBCL 2.5.6-1.fc43
which is several years old---the upstream is on 5.49. Are there
technical problems updating the Fedora RPM? Maxima folks expressed
interest helping, if needed.
The latest version of maxima seems to be 5.49.0?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maxima/c/39e079f02d6eab331190176081c40ef3c079e1dd
That said, I think the maintainers would appreciate assistance too.
That's great, but it seems that the distributed package is 5.47.0---why
isn't 5.49.0 in the main repos for F43?
dnf list maxima
[...]
maxima.x86_64 5.47.0-10.fc43 fedora
Maybe the maintainer forgot to build it? Pinging the maintainers to ask.
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Principal Software Engineer, Emerging RHEL
Red Hat, Inc.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
