On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 09:07:39PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 12:12:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > [...] > > > > I'd like to overhall it and move it into docs.fedoraproject.org (I guess > > > under fesco policy?). > > Sounds fine to me. > > > > I don't think primary vs alternative arches make much sense as terms, or > > > at least as they are currently defined. I'd suggest: > > > > > > primary arches - those arches that are build in the main fedora koji. > > > > > > alternative arches - those arches not built in the main fedora koji > > > > Sounds good too me. > > Yeah, sounds clear enough to me. > > > > but perhaps we need more distinction on alternative, because we have > > > things that are just stood up by some folks in the community and could > > > be one off efforts (I recompiled a bunch of stuff on $foo arch), or a > > > community group stands up their own koji and builds things ongoing, or > > > (as riscv is now) a infra managed koji is setup and community folks > > > build things in an ongoing way and work to get parity with primary. > > > > If community folks do something official, we don't even need to > > describe this in official docs. > > Your sentence is tripping me up. Just to make sure I parsed you right: > did you mean:
> "if community folks do something *non-official*, we don't even need > to describe this in official docs" I meant this ^. Sorry for the wordo. > > I'd drop anything that is not currently done, i.e. most of the second > > part of that wiki page. > > The "Logistics" and "Packaging Issues" sections in the second part are > still largely accurate and apply here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Logistics > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Packaging_Issues Ack. > >From a quick read, these need fixing: > > - The URLs in the "File Storage" section needs to be updated > > - In the "ExcludeArch & ExclusiveArch" section, it says: > > "There is a process running that will notify architecture > maintainers of all changes in Exclude and Exclusive Arch headers > along with daily summaries of all packages with architecture > specific handling" > > I don't think this is happening. That sound like something that wouldn't scale very well, so I don't think we'd want to re-introduce anything like that. The wiki maintains history, so we should just drop stuff like that. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
