On 5/8/26 10:00, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 3:27 PM Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote:
So, I appreciate the closing of rawhide bugs when builds with BZ #s in
the commit/changelog. But I'm not a fan of the process closing bugs
against branched versions. Is that behavior intentional?
So, if you're referring to the brief period where "branched" Fedora
releases behave the same as rawhide (successful build -> automatically
submitted to bodhi), then no, there's no way that I know of to prevent
*both* updates to get marked as "fixing" the bug in the changelog
entry.
Hmm, maybe that's it - but I feel like a recent build closed an F44
build. Which was then annoying because when I went to submit the F44
update the BZ did not show up because it was already closed. Which it
really should not have been because it against F44 and it had not yet
been fixed there.
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane [email protected]
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
