On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 2:40 PM Adam Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2026-05-13 at 19:15 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > For those of you who like me do not closely follow > > the Fedora Discussions forum. I've just become aware > > there are plans to have Fedora: > > > > 1. Ship a LTS kernel, there is no idea who is going to actually > > maintain this next to the regular kernels but we must do this > > because: > > > > 2. All of a sudden it is ok to ship out of tree modules > > starting with NVIDIA's OpenRM module. Throwing out decades > > of consensus on our no our of tree modules policy, so that: > > > > 3. We can start shipping CUDA as part of some Fedora spins, > > there is some handwaving how we won't actually be distributing > > these ISOs our selves but all of a sudden Fedora the FOSS > > distro is going to start promoting the proprietary CUDA with > > all its known vendor-lockin problems. > > > > You can read more about this here: > > > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-ai-developer-desktop-objective/184941 > > I don't think this is quite as terrible as you're worried it is. For > other folks reading this, please also read Gordon's clarifications at > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-ai-developer-desktop-objective/184941/149
For what it's worth, I'm fully against both of those things (LTS kernel and shipping OpenRM modules in Fedora), and it appears to general consensus is aligned in that direction too. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
