On Wed, 20 May 2026 08:23:31 +0200 Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> wrote:
> I made significant progress on the Protobuf rebase this week: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Protobuf_5.x/6.x > > I submitted PR to all packages that fail to build with new protobuf. > Basically to include: > > BuildRequires: protobuf-devel < 4 > > or similar. > > There are several new compat packages availeble: > > * protobuf3 > * protobuf3-c > * mingw(32,64}-protobuf3 - subpackages of protobuf3 (kudos to Sandro Mani > for a contribution) > > I keep up to date the list of packages that received PR and their status here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Protobuf_5.x/6.x#Current_status > > If you do not merge the PR then your package will fail to build once new > protobuf lands rawhide. > > The page above has also a list of packages that builds with the new protobuf > successfully. > > Likely next week, I plan to build the new protobuf in a side tag together > with all packages that build successfully with > the new version of protobuf. > > Three package from this list has issues on s390x. you mean they build fine on non-s390x, but have issues perhaps related to the new protobuf on s390x? Dan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
