Cristian Le via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2026-06-16 06:31:14: > > > On June 15, 2026 6:11:26 PM GMT+02:00, "Sébastien Le Roux" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >Thank you for the idea ! > >I wasn't doing it like this, I was simply building the package (on each > >branch: fedpkg build --nowait) > >then browsing the bodhi website to search for updates regarding atomes, and > >then, > >only when the updates were found to be availalbe I was pushing them. That is > >what I did up to now anyway. > >I tried you way and it did work, so thank you very much and sorry for the > >noise on the list. > > In hopeful news being discussed at Flock, we are debating why we are not > automating that part the same as rawhide.
Indeed there is a point to be made, as long as we keep the "testing" intermediate state for non-rawhide branches. rawhide users have subscribed to receiving "testing packages" (all rawhide packages are), users of non-rawhide branches have not. Now, another question is how much testing those packages in "testing" see, but it's not unheard off, nor is unpushing them or editing the update before it reaches stable. It still seems to serve a purpose, together with improved CI. If we work on that then it's a much better staging ground then "in koji but not bodhi". Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
