Hau idatzi du Ben Beasley ([email protected]) erabiltzaileak (2026 eka. 21(a), ig. (21:03)): > > Yes, the problems with fx were only the same problems shared by other > NodeJS programs. See the recent discussion on this list under the > subject line “binary content in node_modules,” and particularly my > message in that thread, for details. Not much has changed since then! > > I’m not terribly familiar with the nuances of Go packaging, but if the > rewritten fx has any issues from a packaging perspective, they are > likely to be unrelated to the issues that existed at the time I orphaned > it. It would certainly be nice to have this tool back in Fedora.
I've checked and it's quite simple to package, it requires only a minor tweak after using go2rpm. https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/fx-39.2.0-1.fc44.src.rpm @Emanuele if you're interested in maintaining the package you can review the srpm above and follow the "Claiming Ownership of a Retired Package" process: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming - Feel free to ping my in the BZ review ticket. Regards, Mikel -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
