On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 03:51:44PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > My personal goal here (which I believe is achievable) is to do a > one-time high-value cut of all the easy-to-cut packages.
I'm still wondering why exactly. How are you affected by other people maintaining i686 packages? What does this change achieve? > I specifically do not want to dive deeper into the rabbit hole of full > i686 removal - I consciously took an easy task (in comparison) so we > make any progress at all, and I will leave the hard part of doing the > rest to others. > > While definitely undesirable, if that were the only way to get > approval for this cut, I'd create such a list and keep the transitive > dependencies of those packages. > I'd honor the list for this cut, and again, leave the hard work of > figuring out what to do with the list in the future for someone else. > I'd sure be happier without the per-packager wish list though. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
