On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 07:03:51PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 21/07/26 19:37, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: > > I'm not sure what we're trying to achieve by > > unilaterally disabling the i686 subpackages, unless the plan is to > > actually remove the architecture entirely. > > The question is: those 3,400 packages that are claimed to be leaf > packages and not useful to build for i686, how much disk space in > repositories (and network bandwith transfer for synch) and how much
Well, we don't sync i686 repos anymore. Only those things that are in the x86_64 repo/multilib are shipped. So, many of these dont likely matter for that? Or it's a subset at least... > build time consume for nothing? I suspect that both are not Of course they are still built, so that does indeed matter. > negligible... yet there seem to be some reluctance to this change, while > on the other end a proposal to enable x86_64v3 is struggling because "we > don't have enough resources"... In that case the duplication is not worth the resources, IMHO. kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
