On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 8:13 AM Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 1:43 PM Jakub Jelen via devel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 5:51 PM Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> With my FESCo hat on, I don't see myself reasonably considering to
> >> approve this change. The rationale is too weak. If you want to
> >> introduce an *additional* interface, sure, whatever. But as it stands,
> >> this juice is not worth the squeeze.
> >
> > I agree that creating a different API and then switching to that is longer 
> > way,
> > but I see it as a less painful one. If we would go with change of 
> > underlying macro
> > it means we need to fix all packages by some time, otherwise they will fail 
> > to build.
> > If the consensus about the name or the process will be different,
> > I am open for discussion.
>
> I might note that replacing the existing implementation also makes it
> pretty much a non-starter to also backport this change to earlier
> Fedora versions, which is something that quite a few people have asked
> about by now.
> The way I see it, we can either keep the name and just change the
> underlying implementation, *or* also make the new implementation
> available on older releases. But not both. And I would prefer the
> less-disruptive (i.e. new macro) option :)

You can also do both. Just only change the underlying implementation
going forward for the existing macro. If you really want a new name
for it, fine. But I want us to update %gpgverify to avoid mass changes.

And keep in mind that when we eventually replace the gpg2 commands
with shims to Sequoia, in practice everyone will be switched over
regardless of CLI interface. So making the %gpgverify macro use
Sequoia underneath it now is consistent with that.





--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to