Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 24. 08. 26 v 13:05 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): > > On Monday, 24 August 2026 at 12:42, Vít Ondruch via devel wrote: > > Dne 24. 08. 26 v 10:45 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): > > Hey folks, > > I'm updating ffmpeg from 8.1 to 9.0 in Rawhide. > > [...] > > Affected packages (fedrq wrsrc -s ffmpeg -F name): > > rubygem-activestorage > > You have not mentioned explicitly if you are planning mass rebuild or not, > > but I believe this ^^ one won't need a rebuild if it passed your testing. > > I'm planning to rebuild all affected packages in a side tag and I'm > > going to use my provenpackager access for that. > > Is that a problem for your package? > > AFAICT, it is using `ffmpeg` executable, mostly for tests. It is just > `Suggest` for runtime. So it does not need rebuild. It will be just > unnecessary churn. That is all. > If it is easier to build it than skip it, that is also fine. > Vít
Two of the packages I fixed for ffmpeg rebuild were tests failing due to changes to the `ffmpeg` executable, -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
