Dne 24. 08. 26 v 15:22 Leigh Scott napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote:Dne 24. 08. 26 v 13:05 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):On Monday, 24 August 2026 at 12:42, Vít Ondruch via devel wrote: Dne 24. 08. 26 v 10:45 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): Hey folks, I'm updating ffmpeg from 8.1 to 9.0 in Rawhide. [...] Affected packages (fedrq wrsrc -s ffmpeg -F name): rubygem-activestorage You have not mentioned explicitly if you are planning mass rebuild or not, but I believe this ^^ one won't need a rebuild if it passed your testing. I'm planning to rebuild all affected packages in a side tag and I'm going to use my provenpackager access for that. Is that a problem for your package? AFAICT, it is using `ffmpeg` executable, mostly for tests. It is just`Suggest` for runtime. So it does not need rebuild. It will be just unnecessary churn. That is all. If it is easier to build it than skip it, that is also fine. VítTwo of the packages I fixed for ffmpeg rebuild were tests failing due to changes to the `ffmpeg` executable,
If this was issue for rubygem-activestorage (and previously was [1]), such fix typically can be applied even before the SONAME bump lands.
Vít[1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-activestorage/c/d26cb69b4485af83d771e3418228b9df8683cfc2
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
