...snip... > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > For `userhelper`/`consolehelper`: none expected. The package name, > binary names, file locations and modes (`userhelper` setuid root, > `consolehelper` 0755), configuration file format > (`/etc/security/console.apps/<prog>`, `/etc/pam.d/<prog>`), and > command-line interface are unchanged from the C implementation. > Existing managed-program configurations continue to work unmodified > across the upgrade.
It might be nice to list in the change all those fedora packages that depend on these. I know there's no interface changes expected, but it would be nice to notify those maintainers / make more visible the packages affected in case something does appear... It should be pretty easy to do a repoquery for these or look at deps? > `usermount`, `consolehelper-gtk`, `userpasswd`, `userinfo`, and > `pam-panel-icon` are removed from the package. Systems still invoking > any of these directly, symlinking `consolehelper` to `usermount` or > `userpasswd`/`userinfo`, or relying on `consolehelper-gtk` > specifically rather than `consolehelper`, lose that functionality on > upgrade. This is expected to affect few if any systems given these > tools' functionality has been superseded for years. Likewise here? Is there any packages that require these in the fedora packages collection? kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
