On 08/11/2011 12:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:02 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: >> Can we please either disable these nag messages or give developers the >> ability to push a package regardless of testing when it reaches nag age? > > You have that ability for non-critpath updates, but for critpath the > thought is that updates really need to get tested before they go out. > > I've said a few times that I think this could be adjusted for old > releases, on practical grounds. It makes no sense in theory - if > anything, the testing requirements for old releases should be *tighter*, > as there's a greater expectation of stability - but in practice, we just > don't have the test coverage for old releases. Either not many people > run them, or those who do just aren't interested in running > updates-testing and providing feedback.
For stability is why my update was just the addition of two known good
patches and not a rebase. But if we don't get test coverage, and a
maintainer can't do a limited bugfix release which is typically low risk
and well tested, then getting these limited fixes to the people that
need them becomes next to impossible.
> I've never got around to working up a coherent proposed modification and
> submitting it, though - if anyone else can, that'd be great.
I'll just go back to what I've said before. I don't care what system
you create as long as there is something/someone responsible and
accountable for getting things unblocked. Right now there is no
one/thing responsible and accountable for getting things approved and
you nag the one person who doesn't have the ability to do it. That's
just flat backwards.
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
