On 08/11/2011 05:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:02 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: >>> Can we please either disable these nag messages or give developers the >>> ability to push a package regardless of testing when it reaches nag age? > >> You have that ability for non-critpath updates, but for critpath the >> thought is that updates really need to get tested before they go out. > > I've been procmail'ing old_testing_critpath mail to /dev/null for some > time. It makes no sense to be nagging the one person who cannot, by > definition, provide independent testing of the package. Therefore, they > are useless and not worthy of my time. Auto nagmail to proventesters > might be of some value, but not to the package maintainer. > > regards, tom lane
I didn't want to mention that I was thinking of doing the same thing. I
thought in the context of this it would sound more like a threat, when
in truth it's just the reasonable thing to do given the current
situation of being nagged about something I can do nothing about.
I will say though that someone triggered an approval on my package after
I sent the original email, so at least that was helpful.
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
