On 09/15/2011 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima<jchad...@redhat.com> wrote: >> [...] >> . When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd it >> is clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater than >> in the case of upstart one. > > That's the whole point of doing things in parallel ... the CPU is > actually being *used* hence the higher CPU consumption. When you have > work to do you want to throw all resources at it.
Not quite. One normally wants to get a job done _reasonably_ and _reliable_ within the possibilities of _available resources_. Wrt. system bootup, this means, I don't care much on whether booting takes 40 or 80 seconds and don't care whether booting is parallelised, nor do I actually care about which init system is being used. However, resource requirements, usability and reliabilty are a concern to me. That said, /me feels similarly to Gnome3, systemd still has a long way ahead to mature. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
