----- "Brendan Jones" <brendan.jones...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/28/2012 01:10 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
<SNIP> > > > > Point in time release from your stable repository as Fedora 17, 18, > 19. > > This model been working for us for a short while now. > > > > You guys are already set up for success, IMHO much more so than some > of > > the other distributions out there. That's why I chose to base off of > it. > > Are we doing some things wrong? Definitely, but we are also doing > some > > things well enough to know that Fedora would be wildly successful > with a > > rolling release. > > > > As for the comments about users upset that they suddenly get GNOME 3 > via > > a rolling upgrade, that's a communications issue and also what spins > and > > remixes are for. > > > > That is my $.02. I really hope to see Fedora go this route, but if > > Fedora decides to stick to the current release model (which is > already > > excellent) those that want an RPM based rolling release are welcome > to > > come help out at Fuduntu. :D > I think we have all missed the point, this is not about a rolling release for Fedora, it'a about FUDuntu using this list to gain attention for their project. If it is about Fedora it is then about reducing their workload. I'll pass on either, the original thread on this topic should be revived if there is need for more discussion, allowing this one to die. I wish the FUDuntu team good luck in their adventure. -- Bob -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
