On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being a > primary architecture isn't meant to be a benefit to the port - it's > meant to be a benefit to Fedora. Adding arm to the PA list means you'll > have to take on a huge number of additional responsibilities, deal with > more people who are unhappy about the impact upon their packages and so > on. You get very little out of it except that there's more people to > tell you that something's broken.
I don't think this is true: On a primary architecture, every package maintainer is be expected to handle their own packages; this should actually significantly decrease the load on the "architecture maintainers". Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
