On 4/4/2012 12:23 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:23:16 +0200, FMDN (Fabio) wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> with one of the latest updates of corosync, we had to break some >> API/ABI. All packages have been rebuilt and they are waiting for updates >> to be available. >> >> I also re-built sheepdog >> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=310076) >> >> but i don´t have super powers to push the update into F17 and I have >> been unable to get in touch with current sheepdog maintainer (in CC). >> >> Can somebody help please? I have no interest in sheepdog myself, but i >> also don´t like to leave transitions unfinished. > > Hard to help there, because you've created an update ticket already > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4877 > > missing just the sheepdog build. If you unpushed it, any provenpackager > could create a new ticket containing all packages. Editing other's tickets > needs special privileges (probably limited to bodhi admins).
Sheepdog update can be done in a separate update. If provenpackager can make a ticket that would suffice. I don´t/didn´t test sheepdog. > Also, voting +1 on your own updates is being frowned upon. Even more so, > if the stable karma threshold is just 1. We assume the update submitter > is happy with the submitted builds, so that it doesn't need an explicit > vote. It´s a matter of perspective really. All upstreams involved have pre-ACK the update, the builds and relative tests. There is somehow little point to set a karma to 10K and have people login/vote on something that has been done already upfront. So the +1 is the simple formality to make bodhi happy, after 24/48 hours for propagation into updates-testing and nothing has been reported by different teams. Fabio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
