Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) said: > I'm not trying to disparage this work, it seems reasonable (although > I've been bitten by a lot of crappy software assuming network > devices are named eth#, but it's able to be turned off, so meh).
We went through most of the things we shipped back when biosdevname was first introduced and filed a *lot* of bugs to get all those cases fixed, so we *should* be much better there. (Can't speak to third-party software, obviously). If any of those fixes involved merely adding the biosdevname namespaces to whitelists instead of properly getting device names, well, I'm not *supposed* to promote an attitude of violence, but... Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
