----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Nottingham" <nott...@redhat.com>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 1:18:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: High Availability Container Resources
> 
> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> > = Features/ High Availability Container Resources =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/High_Availability_Container_Resources
> > 
> > Feature owner(s): David Vossel <dvos...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > The Container Resources feature allows the HA stack (Pacemaker +
> > Corosync)
> > residing on a host machine to extend management of resources into
> > virtual
> > guest instances (KVM/LXC).
> > 
> > == Detailed description ==
> > This feature is in response to the growing desire for high
> > availability
> > functionality to be extended outside of the host into virtual guest
> > instances.
> > Pacemaker is currently capable of managing virtual guests, meaning
> > Pacemaker
> > can start/stop/monitor/migrate virtual guests anywhere in the
> > cluster, but
> > Pacemaker has no ability to manage the resources that live within
> > the virtual
> > guests. At the moment these virtual guests are very much a black
> > box to
> > Pacemaker.
> > 
> > The Container Resources feature changes this by giving Pacemaker
> > the ability
> > to reach into the virtual guests and manage resources in the exact
> > same way
> > resources are managed on the host nodes. Ultimately this gives the
> > HA stack
> > the ability to manage resources across all the nodes in cluster as
> > well as any
> > virtual guests that reside within those cluster nodes.
> 
> Does this require the management to live on the virtual host, or can
> it be
> done entirely remotely with the cluster management server residing
> elsewhere
> and talking to all the virtual guest instances directly?

Management can be done entirely remotely from any cluster node running the ha 
stack.  There are no location restrictions. We are not restricted to the remote 
instance being a virtual guest either.  It could be bare-metal for all we care.

Initially the cli management tools and documentation will focus on virtual 
guest use case where the management is performed on the virtual host machine.  
This just means we are planning on making that a very easy use-case to 
configure.  The tools will be available work outside of this use-case though.  
It will just take a little more knowledge from the user.

-- Vossel


> Bill
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to