On 19/08/2013 4:31 PM, "Richard Vickery" <richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote: > > > >> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop > >> environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of like a > >> disaster waiting to happen. > > > > The current release blocking desktops are Gnome and KDE. If those are > > broken then F20 doesn't ship - if they're working, it ships. It'd be > > unfortunate to ship a release that doesn't support the non-blocking > > desktops, but (right now) it's fundamentally up to them to provide the > > development effort to ensure that they have a full feature set. > > > > -- > > Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org > > -- > > Instead of shipping it, is there a problem with giving it to those on > the developer list and letting us iron out the kinks? >
I do not really understand what you mean here.... /Andreas > -- > Richard > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct