On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 14:31 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> 
> >> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-02-27/fedora-meeting-1.2014-02-27-15.00.log.html
> >> 
> >> OK super, pretty much all Server WG questions are answered. That was easy. 
> >> Summary is they are going to go with XFS on LVM. LVM vs LVM thinp is to be 
> >> determined. And they only want this one option for the guided path (i.e. 
> >> sounds like Partition Scheme pop-up goes away).
> >> 
> >> For Workstation WG it can be the same thing too. Or optionally pick an 
> >> alternate: plain partition (probably ext4), or Btrfs.
> > 
> > Not btrfs.  We answered that yesterday.
> 
> I know that, no Btrfs by default. The above pertains to an (optional) 
> alternate.

I'd really like it if we can drop btrfs to custom partitioning. I really
don't like this 'it's not really ready to be default but we're going to
offer it in a way that makes it look as good as the default choice'
thing.

Also, custom part has the 'choose your own adventure' dropdown itself
now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to