On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:44:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:39:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Ok. Once the build's done let's remove the ExcludeArch so it continues 
> > to show up as a failure in mass builds. It can be restored if we 
> > actually need to make any code changes.
> 
> Where is the Fedora policy that we should break builds so that we can
> collectively remember there is a bug in a particular architecture?
> That's what Bugzilla is for.

Having it show up on the FTBFS list sparked a discussion that noted 
upstream movement on this. If it hadn't been there we wouldn't have 
noticed, and even once LLVM is fixed this would probably have remained 
ExcludeArch: arm.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to