On 06/11/2014 02:08 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
No need to apologize! It's just the truth: ARM is not ready to be a primary
Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is important even when
speaking the truth.
Matthew, in this case, I concur with Kevin. The facts are obvious and
because of this obviousness, the tone should not matter at all, IMO.
It's time to *openly* discuss and to *seriously question* the arm's
position in Fedora, even though such a discussion and/or the outcome
should show to be unpleasant and/or undesired to some people/entities
and their plans/interests.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
