An update on this:

Kevin Kofler wrote:
> This is only a minor annoyance where a portable fallback exists (we can
> just ship the portable C/C++ version in /usr/lib and the SSE2 version in
> /usr/lib/sse2, as we are doing with Qt 5 QtDeclarative). The real problem
> is software which has no portable fallback at all, such as
> Chromium/QtWebEngine or Darktable. This completely screws not only
> non-SSE2 x86, but also all secondary architectures, and in some cases such
> as Darktable, even the primary architecture ARM. It is unfortunate that
> the number of such non- portable software seems increasing lately.
> Portability to any and all CPU architectures used to be a big selling
> point for Free Software. These days, more and more projects seem happy to
> sacrifice this on the altar of performance. :-(

I think I have what it takes to get QtWebEngine working on non-SSE2 now:
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293190
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196#c24

Thankfully, V8 actually does support non-SSE2 x86: Shortly after support was 
removed from the "ia32" target, it was readded as a separate "x87" one. So 
only Chromium/QtWebEngine needs patching (because they started requiring 
SSE2 in their own code).

That said, this only helps 32-bit x86. Most secondary architectures are 
still screwed, because V8 does not have portable C/C++ fallback code (unlike 
Chromium's own code).

        Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to