On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:11 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 07.05.2008, at 19:54, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Bert Freudenberg > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, my trust in OLPC is being probed every other day. I take your > > word, and I trust a few other people there, but I also have to > > acknowledge that priorities at OLPC are changing. > It never hurts to be paranoid, but the educational priorities of our tool and software development are not changing. There are priorities that have not been effectively set in that regard -- but your input there is part of any decisions that are made. Perhaps we could use an open working group to review and set core activities that can guide the list of activities (and specific versions) that is proposed for each release. What people spend time discussing and worrying about has changed, and this can distract from addressing issues such as what the best activty presentation is for children and clasrooms in different settings -- one reason that recent discussions on the education.project list have been great to see and take part in. > > And it's certainly no coincidence that the list of activities in olpc3 > > is what Kim wanted in ticket 6598. You certainly remember the > > discussions. > > You're on crack, Bert. For the record, I don't think Bert is on crack. If there are any activities other than Browse and Journal included in even experimental builds, I would like to see them include a core list, certainly including etoys, log and terminal, for instance. I've added my current thoughts on having fallback activities in /usr/share to 2064. Cheers, SJ
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
