On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good >> idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component. > >Can we go back to require the submitter to provide a component? In >many cases it will be the right one, sometimes the submitter will get >it wrong. In any case it will be better than depending on someone to >have to go through all the "not specified" tickets and choose the >right component.
I'm a strong proponent of people writing down what they know. I want to be able to rely on component assignments when they're made. I do not support reverting the 'not specified' change. Why do you prefer your alternative? Michael _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
