Michael Stone wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good >>> idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component. >> Can we go back to require the submitter to provide a component? In >> many cases it will be the right one, sometimes the submitter will get >> it wrong. In any case it will be better than depending on someone to >> have to go through all the "not specified" tickets and choose the >> right component. > > I'm a strong proponent of people writing down what they know. I want to > be able to rely on component assignments when they're made. I do not > support reverting the 'not specified' change. Why do you prefer your > alternative? > > Michael
Please revert the not specifying of a component. See here a good example that this does not work. This blocker has been unseen for 4 days! http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7765 because the component was not set. Maybe http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7764 gets never fixed as well... This does really not make any sense to me! Simon _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
