Carlos wrote (regarding Sugar on an XO): > > Apps need to be sugarized.
This is true when Sugar is the primary interface of the target user population. But the "Subject" of this topic is XFCE. I am going to make the assumption that an user sophisticated enough to use XFCE will be sophisticated enough not to need the simplified GUI that sugarization provides. I myself have had reasonable success installing Linux applications on my XO, then launching them from the command line. [And launching from Terminal bypasses Rainbow's restrictions on applications.] I keep wondering, considering Moore's Law and the availability of netbooks, why shoehorn specifically Sugar (and the XO) into competing for the "traditional_Linux_interface" laptop role ? mikus _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel